<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Thoughts on Cary Lee</title>
    <link>https://www.caryme.com/thoughts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Thoughts on Cary Lee</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:09:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.caryme.com/thoughts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>On Simplicity and Edge Cases</title>
      <link>https://www.caryme.com/thoughts/on-simplicity-and-edge-cases/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:09:35 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.caryme.com/thoughts/on-simplicity-and-edge-cases/</guid>
      <description>Questions to ask:
What’s the dumbest, most naive, most brute-force approach that could possibly work? What are the positive qualities of that approach? What are the downsides? Is it slow? Expensive? Does it miss important edge cases? Take these and compare them to our current state. Are the positive qualities - downsides of the naive approach better than where we are today? If so, you might have a good first version!</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
